Current recommendations on the assessment of acute coronary syndrome patients

Current recommendations for the assessment and treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) focus on a multifaceted, evidence-based approach that builds on prior guidelines while integrating advancements in pharmacotherapy and diagnostic techniques. ACS encompasses conditions such as unstable angina and myocardial infarction (both ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation), necessitating prompt identification and management to optimize patient outcomes.

Initial assessment should prioritize a comprehensive clinical evaluation, utilizing clinical decision tools such as the HEART score (https://www.heartscore.nl/), which aids in stratifying risk among patients presenting with chest pain (Wang et al., 2024)Babu et al., 2023). The integration of these tools, alongside traditional metrics such as electrocardiogram (ECG) findings and troponin levels, forms the cornerstone of early risk stratification, helping to rule in or rule out ACS (Damani & Roongsritong, 2025). The use of computed tomography coronary angiography is also highlighted as a valuable tool in selected cases to assist in diagnosis (Wang et al., 2024).

Pharmacological management remains pivotal in the treatment of ACS, particularly regarding antiplatelet therapy. Current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) combining aspirin with a P2Y12 inhibitor, such as clopidogrel, for at least 12 months following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to reduce the risk of recurrent thrombotic events (Cheng et al., 2025). Emerging evidence suggests modifications in antiplatelet regimens may be warranted depending on individual patient characteristics and the presence of specific complications such as spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) (Park et al., 2024; Ilić et al., 2023).

A particular emphasis has been placed on tailoring treatment strategies according to the demographic and clinical profile of patients, particularly older adults, who may present unique challenges due to comorbidities and frailty (Damluji et al., 2023). The recommendations advocate for an individual approach to therapy, factoring in the complexities of polypharmacy and the need for careful monitoring of potential adverse effects (Damluji et al., 2023).

Furthermore, the guidelines encourage healthcare providers to optimize adherence to evidence-based therapies through comprehensive patient education and awareness of secondary prevention measures. These include lifestyle modifications, the management of comorbid conditions, and engagement in cardiac rehabilitation programs, which have been shown to improve clinical outcomes significantly (Gebremichael et al., 2024).

As part of evolving care strategies, attention to socioeconomic factors and barriers to accessing care is increasingly recognized as crucial in the management of ACS. The American Heart Association recommends that healthcare systems work to address disparities in treatment and outcomes across different patient populations (Sarrafzadegan et al., 2024).

In conclusion, current recommendations emphasize a holistic and personalized approach to the assessment and management of ACS, incorporating the latest evidence in pharmacotherapy, technology, and patient-centered care practices to enhance outcomes for individuals at risk of or suffering from acute coronary syndromes.

References:

  • Ahmadi, A., Sabri, M., Navabi, Z., Dehghan, B., Taheri, M., & Mahdavi, C. (2024). The impact of self-care recommendations with and without tilt-training on quality of life in children and adolescents with vasovagal syncope: a randomized clinical trial. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 29(3), 358-367.
    https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_137_23
  • Amin, S., Gupta, V., Du, G., McMullen, C., Sirrine, M., Williams, M., … & Li, J. (2021). Developing and demonstrating the viability and availability of the multilevel implementation strategy for syncope optimal care through engagement (mission) syncope app: evidence-based clinical decision support tool. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(11), e25192.
    https://doi.org/10.2196/25192
  • Babu, M., Parimala, L., & Barathi, K. (2023). Assess the risk level of acute coronary syndrome (acs) among patients with chest pain in emergency department. CM, (26), 696-700.
    https://doi.org/10.18137/cardiometry.2023.26.696700
  • Brieger, D., Tofler, G., & Chia, K. (2024). Use of a leadless pacemaker in the management of swallow syncope: a case report. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 47(8), 1061-1064.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14923
  • Cheng, B., Xiang-hai, K., Chen, J., He, Q., Zhou, M., & Deng, A. (2025). Assessing the efficacy and safety of low dose clopidogrel in chinese acs patients undergoing pci: a retrospective study. Medicine, 104(22), e42551.
    https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000042551
  • Damani, D. and Roongsritong, C. (2025). Zero coronary artery calcification: a promising value in acute chest pain evaluation. Cureus.
    https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.78365
  • Damluji, A., Forman, D., Wang, T., Chikwe, J., Kunadian, V., Rich, M., … & Alexander, K. (2023). Management of acute coronary syndrome in the older adult population: a scientific statement from the american heart association. Circulation, 147(3).
    https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000001112
  • Francisco‐Pascual, J., Jordán, P., Silva, J., & Rivas-Gándara, N. (2023). Arrhythmic syncope: from diagnosis to management. World Journal of Cardiology, 15(4), 119-141.
    https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v15.i4.119
  • Gebremichael, L., Beleigoli, A., Foote, J., Bulamu, N., Ramos, J., Suebkinorn, O., … & Clark, R. (2024). missed opportunity: a clinical data linkage study of guideline‐directed medical therapy and clinical outcomes of patients discharged with acute coronary syndrome who attended cardiac rehabilitation programs. Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, 54(4), 314-322.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/jppr.1923
  • Ghariq, M., Bodegom‐Vos, L., Brignole, M., Peeters, S., Groot, B., Kaal, E., … & Thijs, R. (2021). Factors facilitating and hindering the implementation of the european society of cardiology syncope guidelines at the emergency department: a nationwide qualitative study. International Journal of Cardiology, 333, 167-173.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.02.067
  • Ghariq, M., Hout, W., Dekkers, O., Bootsma, M., Groot, B., Groothuis, J., … & Fokke, C. (2023). Diagnostic and societal impact of implementing the syncope guidelines of the european society of cardiology (synergy study). BMC Medicine, 21(1).
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-03056-6
  • Ilić, I., Radunović, A., Timčić, S., Odanović, N., Radoicic, D., Dukuljev, N., … & Apostolović, S. (2023). Drugs for spontaneous coronary dissection: a few untrusted options. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 10.
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1275725
  • Johnston, S. (2025). The hope and the hype of artificial intelligence for syncope management. European Heart Journal - Digital Health, 6(5), 1046-1054.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf061
  • Loughlin, E., Judge, C., Gorey, S., Costello, M., Murphy, R., Waters, R., … & Canavan, M. (2020). Increased salt intake for orthostatic intolerance syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Medicine, 133(12), 1471-1478.e4.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.05.028
  • Park, H., Cho, L., Fendrikova-Mahlay, N., Chaudhury, P., & Cameron, S. (2024). Antiplatelet therapy following spontaneous coronary artery dissection: systemic review..
    https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.03.24312989
  • Reed, M., Karuranga, S., Kearns, D., Alawiye, S., Clarke, B., Möckel, M., … & Laribi, S. (2023). Management of syncope in the emergency department: a european prospective cohort study (seed). European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 31(2), 136-146.
    https://doi.org/10.1097/mej.0000000000001101
  • Sarrafzadegan, N., Bagherikholenjani, F., Shahidi, S., Ghasemi, G., Shirvani, E., Rajati, F., … & Abdi, A. (2024). Development of the first iranian clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 29(1).
    https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_851_23
  • Shabbir, M., Shaukat, M., Ehtesham, M., Murawski, S., Singh, S., & Alimohammad, R. (2022). Bifascicular block in unexplained syncope is underrecognized and under-evaluated: a single-center audit of esc guidelines adherence. Plos One, 17(2), e0263727.
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263727
  • Wang, K., Taggart, C., McDermott, M., O’Brien, R., Oatey, K., Keating, L., … & Gray, A. (2024). Clinical decision aids and computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Emergency Medicine Journal, 41(8), 488-494.
    https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-213904
  • Wen, C., Wang, S., Zou, R., Wang, Y., Tan, C., Xu, Y., … & Wang, C. (2020). Duration of treatment with oral rehydration salts for vasovagal syncope in children and adolescents. The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, 62(5), 820-825.
    https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjped.2020.05.014


Recent blogs: