Quantitative waveform capnography (EtCO2) plays a critical role in airway management and the assessment of respiratory failure, particularly in emergency situations. This method of monitoring provides a real-time assessment of carbon dioxide levels in exhaled breath, which is essential for confirming the correct placement of endotracheal tubes (ETT). The use of quantitative waveform capnography helps clinicians differentiate between proper tracheal placement and misplacements, such as esophageal intubation, which can lead to significant morbidity if not identified promptly. Studies indicate that the use of quantitative waveform capnography substantially reduces the risk of undiagnosed esophageal intubation, ensuring patient safety by confirming correct ETT placement with greater reliability than traditional methods such as auscultation or visual confirmation of tube placement alone (Nichols et al., 2013; , (Abdelrahman et al., 2020; , Bullock et al., 2017).
The American Heart Association's guidelines for advanced cardiac life support endorse quantitative waveform capnography as the gold standard for ETT verification (Abdelrahman et al., 2020; , Ching et al., 2021). This method is especially favored in the hospital setting due to its ability to continuously measure and graphically display CO2 levels, allowing for instant verification of ventilation effectiveness. Meena et al. highlighted the superiority of quantitative waveform capnography over other methods in detecting correct ETT placement, emphasizing its ability to provide immediate feedback on ventilatory function post-intubation (Meena et al., 2022; , (Schlag et al., 2013). Moreover, studies have demonstrated that patients whose ETT placements were confirmed via quantitative waveform capnography exhibited quicker detection of exhaled CO2, significantly improving the time it takes for clinicians to ensure respiratory adequacy during emergencies (Hunt et al., 2018).
The practical application of capnography is complemented by an understanding of its limitations. For instance, waveform capnography may not be available in all emergency departments, which can affect its widespread use (Thomas et al., 2017). Additionally, factors such as low cardiac output, which may occur during CPR, can lead to misleading capnographic readings, making it a less reliable indicator of ETT placement under specific conditions (Herrería‐Bustillo et al., 2016; , Ku & Lee, 2022). These challenges underscore the need for clinicians to be trained in interpreting capnographic data, as well as the importance of having backup confirmation methods available, such as colorimetric detectors or ultrasonography (King et al., 2019; , Saeed et al., 2023).
Furthermore, the role of quantitative waveform capnography extends beyond simple confirmation of ETT placement; it serves as a valuable indicator of overall respiratory status in patients experiencing respiratory failure. By continuously monitoring CO2 levels, clinicians can detect immediate changes in ventilation, such as in the event of an airway obstruction or hypoventilation (Waugh et al., 2011). This real-time monitoring capability allows for rapid intervention, making quantitative waveform capnography an essential tool in treating patients during procedural sedation and managing critical airway situations (Schlag et al., 2013).
To support the effectiveness of quantitative waveform capnography, studies have consistently shown its high accuracy in confirming endotracheal tube placement across diverse patient populations and clinical settings (Adi et al., 2013; , Moghawri et al., 2019). Additionally, findings suggest that supplementary techniques, such as ultrasound and clinical evaluations like the assessment of breath sounds or chest rise, can enhance the reliability of ETT verification when combined with waveform capnography (Abdelrahman et al., 2020; , Prasad, 2020). This integrative approach is particularly useful in emergency scenarios where misplacement can have immediate life-threatening consequences (Pradeep & Benny, 2024).
In summary, the analysis of quantitative waveform capnography portrays it as a cornerstone in airway management and the evaluation of respiratory function during critical care. Its advantages, including rapid feedback, real-time monitoring, and high specificity for proper tube placement, solidify its position as an indispensable tool for healthcare providers involved in emergency medicine and anesthesiology. As healthcare providers continue to refine their utilization of capnography, particularly in the pediatric population and in those with challenging airway anatomies, the integration of workflow improvements and technological advancements can further enhance patient safety and care outcomes in airway management contexts (Das et al., 2014).
References:
- Abdelrahman, T., Abdelhameed, G., & Armanious, S. (2020). Evaluation of real-time tracheal ultrasound versus colorimetric capnography as a point of care tool for confirmation of endotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled study. Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 12(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-020-00117-3
- Adi, O., Chuan, T., & Manikam, R. (2013). A feasibility study on bedside upper airway ultrasonography compared to waveform capnography for verifying endotracheal tube location after intubation. Critical Ultrasound Journal, 5(1), 7.
https://doi.org/10.1186/2036-7902-5-7
- Bullock, A., Dodington, J., Donoghue, A., & Langhan, M. (2017). Capnography use during intubation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatric Emergency Care, 33(7), 457-461.
https://doi.org/10.1097/pec.0000000000000813
- Ching, C., Leong, B., Nair, P., Chan, K., Seow, E., Lee, F., … & Lim, S. (2021). Singapore advanced cardiac life support guidelines 2021. Singapore Medical Journal, 62(08), 390-403.
https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2021109
- Das, S., Choupoo, N., Haldar, R., & Lahkar, A. (2014). Transtracheal ultrasound for verification of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal Canadien D Anesthésie, 62(4), 413-423.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-014-0301-z
- Herrería‐Bustillo, V., Kuo, K., Burke, P., Cole, R., & Bacek, L. (2016). A pilot study evaluating the use of cervical ultrasound to confirm endotracheal intubation in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, 26(5), 654-658.
https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.12507
- Hunt, K., Yamada, Y., Murthy, V., Bhat, P., Campbell, M., Fox, G., … & Greenough, A. (2018). Detection of exhaled carbon dioxide following intubation during resuscitation at delivery. Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 104(2), F187-F191.
https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313982
- King, A., Blank, D., Bhatia, R., Marzbanrad, F., & Malhotra, A. (2019). Tools to assess lung aeration in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatrica, 109(4), 667-678.
https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15028
- Ku, H. and Lee, S. (2022). Factors for advancing emergency airway management practice. SV.
https://doi.org/10.22514/sv.2022.032
- Meena, R., Roy, P., Joshi, N., Garg, M., & Bhati, S. (2022). Comparison of ultrasonography, clinical method and capnography for detecting correct endotracheal tube placement- a prospective, observational study. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 66(12), 826-831.
https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_240_22
- Moghawri, M., Zayed, N., & Ibrahim, D. (2019). Reliability of ultrasound in confirming endotracheal tube placement as a new and fast tool. Egyptian Journal of Bronchology, 13(5), 684-689.
https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_79_19
- Nichols, M., Acker, J., Bendall, J., & Asha, S. (2013). Evaluating the incidence of unrecognised oesophageal intubation by paramedics. Journal of Paramedic Practice, 5(4), 212-218.
https://doi.org/10.12968/jpar.2013.5.4.212
- Pradeep, S. and Benny, H. (2024). Comparison of upper airway ultrasonography against quantitative waveform capnography for validating endotracheal tube position in a south indian population. Cureus.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.52628
- Prasad, B. (2020). The accuracy of ultrasonography in confirming endotracheal tube placement in emergency department. Medpulse International Journal of Medicine, 16(2), 57-60.
https://doi.org/10.26611/10211622
- Saeed, R., Hamza, M., Bangash, T., Latif, A., Ammar, T., & Kakepotto, I. (2023). Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement taking capnography as a gold standard. Proceedings of Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex Lahore, 37(4), 46-52.
https://doi.org/10.47489/szmc.v37i4.436
- Schlag, C., Wörner, A., Wagenpfeil, S., Kochs, E., Schmid, R., & Delius, S. (2013). Capnography improves detection of apnea during procedural sedation for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology, 27(10), 582-586.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/852454
- Thomas, V., Paul, C., Rajeev, P., & Palatty, B. (2017). Reliability of ultrasonography in confirming endotracheal tube placement in an emergency setting. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 21(5), 257-261.
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijccm.ijccm_417_16
- Waugh, J., Epps, C., & Khodneva, Y. (2011). Capnography enhances surveillance of respiratory events during procedural sedation: a meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 23(3), 189-196.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.08.012